• Rivensin Rivensin
  • Deny Jollyta Institut Bisnis dan Teknologi Pelita Indonesia


Methods in the Decision Support System (DSS) have their own techniques in solving organizational problems. Determining the appropriate DSS method with the problem is a common difficulty experienced by organizations. The performance of a DSS method can be measured in various ways. This research aims to determine the performance of the two DSS methods, specifically Technique for Others Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) and Election at Choix Traduisant La Realite (ELECTRE) which are applied to the best lecturer selection system. The research was carried out on software designed using efficiency as one of the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 9126. The performance of both methods tested on validity and sensitivity testing. The results showed that the TOPSIS performance was better in terms of efficiency and sensitivity. TOPSIS execution time is 0.0085 seconds faster and has a greater sensitivity value of 2.18% compared to ELECTRE. Validity result gave the best results reaching 100% to ELECTRE. That means, the ELECTRE calculation can be trusted because it has a perfect level of accuracy.


Download data is not yet available.


[1] A. Berisha and S. Shaqiri, “Management Information System and Decision-Making,” Acad. J. Interdiscip. Stud., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 19–23, 2014, doi: 10.5901/ajis.2014.v3n2p19.
[2] M. C. Er, “Decision Support Systems: A summary, problems, and future trends,” Decis. Support Syst., vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 355–363, 1988.
[3] I. Padayache, P. Kotze, and A. Van Der Merwe, “ISO 9126 external systems quality characteristics, sub-characteristics and domain specific criteria for evaluating e-Learning systems,” J. Less-Common Met., vol. 1, no. January, p. 10, 2010, [Online]. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228987388.
[4] D. Jollyta, “TOPSIS Technique for Selecting of Property Development Location,” Softw. Eng., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 20–26, 2016, doi: 10.11648/j.se.20180601.14.
[5] R. M. Zulqarnain, M. Saeed, N. Ahmad, F. Dayan, and B. Ahmad, “Application of TOPSIS Method for Decision Making,” Int. J. Sci. Res. Math. Stat. Sci., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 76–81, 2020.
[6] V. Balioti, C. Tzimopoulos, and C. Evangelides, “Multi-Criteria Decision Making Using TOPSIS Method Under Fuzzy Environment. Application in Spillway Selection,” Proceedings, vol. 2, no. 637, pp. 1–8, 2018, doi: 10.3390/proceedings2110637.
[7] U. Effendi, A. Wardahniati, and P. Deoranto, “Perencanaan Strategi Pemasaran Keripik Kentang dengan Metode ANP dan TOPSIS di Agronas Gizi Food , Kota Batu,” J. Teknol. dan Manaj. Agroindustri, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 124–132, 2018.
[8] A. Jauhari, F. A. Mufarroha, M. A. Wijarnoko, M. Y. I. Maulana, A. T. B. Al Haq, and L. Linawati, “Smart Mobile Application for Decision Support Systems on Determination of Resident in Dormitory,” J. Ilm. Kursor, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 135–144, 2020, doi: 10.21107/kursor.v10i3.236.
[9] S. A. S. A. Mary and G. Suganya, “Multi-Criteria Decision Making Using ELECTRE,” Circuits Syst., vol. 07, no., pp. 1008–1020, 2016, doi: 10.4236/cs.2016.76085.
[10] F. Masya, H. Prastiawan, and D. Putri, “Design and Implementation of Lecturer Evaluation System Using ELECTRE Method in Web-based Application,” Int. Res. J. Comput. Sci., vol. 4, no. 05, pp. 242–250, 2017.
[11] M. F. Che Hassan, M. U. Mohd Rosli, and M. A. Mohd Redzuan, “Material selection in a sustainable manufacturing practice of a badminton racket frame using Elimination and Choice Expressing Reality (ELECTRE) Method,” in Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2018, vol. 1020, no. 1, pp. 1–14, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1020/1/012012.
[12] D. Alper and C. Başdar, “A Comparison of TOPSIS and ELECTRE Methods: An Application on the Factoring Industry,” Bus. Econ. Res. J., vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 627–646, 2017, doi: 10.20409/berj.2017.70.
[13] S. M. Maffirotin, M. Wati, and H. J. Setyadi, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penerima Bantuan Sosial Daerah Kutai Kartanegara Menggunakan Metode Electre,” J. Rekayasa Teknol. Inf., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 9–16, 2018, [Online]. Available: http://e-journals.unmul.ac.id/index.php/INF/article/view/1362.
[14] Nofiyani and D. Anggoro, “Pengembangan Sistem Penunjang Keputusan Berbasis Web Untuk Menentukan Best Customer dengan Model RFM (Recency, Frequency dan Monetary), Metode Comparative Performance Index Dan Algoritma K-Means,” J. Sist. Komput., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 13–20, 2017.
[15] D. Fernando and N. Handayani, “Uji Sensitivitas Metode Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Dalam Menentukan Lokasi Penyebaran Media Promosi,” JSiI (Jurnal Sist. Informasi), vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 51–57, 2018, doi: 10.30656/jsii.v5i2.776.
[16] S. Bahri, “Optimasi Cluster K-Means dengan Modifikasi Metode Elbow untuk Menganalisis Disrupsi Pendidikan Tinggi,” 2019.
[17] K. Smk, N. Pati, and T. Pelajaran, “Pengaruh Kebiasaan Pola Makan Terhadap Konsentrasi Belajar,” vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 42–57, 2014.
How to Cite
RIVENSIN, Rivensin; JOLLYTA, Deny. A TOPSIS AND ELECTRE COMPARISON ANALYSIS ON WEB-BASED SOFTWARE. Jurnal Ilmiah Kursor, [S.l.], v. 11, n. 1, july 2021. ISSN 2301-6914. Available at: <http://kursorjournal.org/index.php/kursor/article/view/253>. Date accessed: 22 jan. 2022. doi: https://doi.org/10.21107/kursor.v11i1.253.